Maxime Chazal vs Raphael Vaksmann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

When considering the performance of players in terms of second serve effectiveness, Chazal has recently secured 43.69% of points, whereas Vaksmann has achieved a slightly higher rate at 45.34%. This statistic often serves as a reliable predictor in match outcomes. Additionally, the return game performance highlights that Chazal has won 46.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vaksmann follows closely with 44.16%. On the first serve return, Chazal has outperformed slightly with 28.83% compared to Vaksmann's 27.73%. These return metrics play a significant role in determining favoritism in head-to-head matchups.

Overall, Chazal has maintained a winning record of 59.46% over the past year with a match tally reflecting a 44/30 win-loss ratio. In contrast, Vaksmann has a slightly lower match-winning percentage at 52.17%, corresponding to a 12/11 record. Notably, Chazal has competed predominantly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, boasting a 71.11% success rate (32/13), whereas Vaksmann has participated in similar events, maintaining a 52.17% win rate.

Surface preferences also play a critical role in evaluating player tendencies. Chazal exhibits a strong performance on clay with a 63% career win rate, while their indoor hard court success is limited to 31%. Vaksmann similarly excels on clay with 54% victory and finds indoor hard courts less favorable with a win rate of 35%. Despite this, the quality of opponents each player has faced indicates that Vaksmann has tackled competitors of a higher average ranking of 335, as opposed to Chazal's 415.72.

Analyzing under pressure scenarios, Vaksmann shows an impressive ability to save breakpoints at 58.39%, slightly edging out Chazal, who saves 54.33%. Additionally, in scenarios that progress to deciding sets, Vaksmann has a 71% success rate, compared to Chazal's 59%. Regarding break point conversions, Chazal capitalizes on 35.77% of opportunities, a bit higher than Vaksmann's 32% conversion rate.

Conclusively, factoring in various aspects, including surface preferences, average opponent quality, and specific performance metrics such as breakpoint conversions and deciding set outcomes, Vaksmann demonstrates a marginal advantage. Therefore, the predictive calculation based on these statistics leans towards Vaksmann as the likely winner of the forthcoming match.